|
CASE STUDY 1
Preparation of occupational health and consumer risk assessments for
three flame retardants as part of the submission prepared by the
Irish Health and Safety Authority to the Technical Meeting for the
implementation of the European Existing Substances Regulations.
Workplace Environment Solutions Ltd was awarded this contract due to
previous experience in compiling these assessment documents during
Tracey and Martin’s employment at the Health and Safety Executive.
The
preparation of these documents required gathering data from industry
and technical literature to inform the assessment process. The
information is collated and interpreted, and exposure scenarios
developed. The first drafts were presented to industry for comment
and following amendments were then submitted to the Member States’
competent authorities for peer review.
Following this round of comments a further draft was prepared for
consideration by member states at a technical meeting. This draft
was presented at the meeting in person and was well-received. The
risk assessments have prompted further data collection by industry,
so the risk assessments will be refined following receipt of this
data. The outcome of the overall risk assessment will influence the
way in which these substances are used in the future within the
European Union.
CASE STUDY 2
A North West engineering company reported a case of respiratory
illness, possibly associated with exposure to MWFs, to the Health
and Safety Executive under RIDDOR. Workplace Environment Solutions
were asked to assess occupational exposure to MWFs. MDHS (Methods
for the Determination of Hazardous Substances) 95/2, Measurement of
personal exposure of metal working machine operators to airborne
water-mix metalworking fluid, was followed, to determine
exposure to the water soluble fluid in use. In addition, the
condition of the sump fluids was assessed through the measurement of
fluid strength, pH and bacteriological content.
Operators and supervisors were also interviewed to determine
approaches to fluid management. Although MWF mist levels were below
the HSE guidance value of 1mgm-3 (ref: HSE guidance, Working
safely with metal working fluids), the in-use fluid was found to
be heavily contaminated with bacteria and in some cases at the wrong
fluid strength. The condition of the fluid was consistent with the
reported and observed approaches to fluid management. Therefore,
workers, although not exposed to high mist levels, were exposed to a
“dirty” mist.
Recommendations were provided for the effective management of the
fluid to remove the current levels of contamination and maintain
them within acceptable guidelines.
CASE STUDY 3
Providing
advice and support on asbestos management to a large utility
company.
Workplace Environment Solutions Ltd was approached by the company to
provide advice in the management of asbestos. Working with the
company, WES devised an asbestos management plan and implementation
strategy to facilitate compliance with Regulation 4 of the Control
of Asbestos at Work Regulations 2002. As part of the implementation,
WES provided advice on surveying, wrote a number of procedures,
carried out awareness training, and specific task training for those
who would be involved in minor work on asbestos. WES continue to
provide ongoing support and advice on asbestos management to the
company.
For
other companies and local authorities, WES have carried out
retrospective risk assessments following asbestos exposure
incidents, and carried out reviews of asbestos management policy and
procedures after poor surveying or removal contracts.
|